Controversial Comments Spark Outrage
Tensions escalated in Niger State’s APC when chieftain Jonathan Vatsa called for Senate President Godswill Akpabio to resign. Akpabio allegedly encouraged hunger protesters to continue, claiming it wouldn’t affect the privileged, with his comment “we shall be eating.” This remark sparked widespread criticism across political and social spectrums.
Denials and Party Embarrassment
Akpabio denied making the statement, but Vatsa called it “insensitive and embarrassing” to the APC, noting a value disconnect. He highlighted Akpabio’s past with the PDP as aggravating the issue, undermining party values. Vatsa expressed concern over how such attitudes could damage the party’s image and public perception of its leadership.
Vatsa’s Harsh Critique of APC Leadership
Vatsa intensified his criticism, highlighting the APC’s poor judgment in making Akpabio the Senate President. He argued that this decision showcases a broader issue within the party. Vatsa claimed the party has been hijacked by former PDP members previously rejected by Nigerians. This, he says, perpetuates a culture of self-service at the expense of genuine governance.
Historical Context and Continuing Patterns
Vatsa reflected on Akpabio’s 16-year tenure under the PDP regime, marked by similar controversies, and criticized the continuation of such behaviors in the APC. He suggested this undermines the party’s foundational commitment to change and reform.
Call for Party Redemption
The critique leads to a call for immediate action to restore the APC’s integrity and public trust, beginning with Akpabio’s resignation. Vatsa insists that Akpabio stepping down is crucial for the APC to show its commitment to reform. He emphasizes the importance of distancing the party from past corrupt practices to renew public confidence.
Implications for Future Elections
As the political climate heats up ahead of the 2027 elections, this incident underscores the internal struggles within the APC and the broader challenges it faces in maintaining unity and public confidence. The outcome of this controversy could significantly influence the party’s strategy and electoral prospects moving forward.
Follow us on Socials: