Former Nigerian military leader General Ibrahim Babangida, widely known as IBB, has publicly voiced regret over one of the most controversial decisions of his tenure: the annulment of the June 12, 1993, presidential election. In a surprising admission tied to the launch of his memoirs, Babangida acknowledged that the late Moshood Kashimawo Olawale (MKO) Abiola was the rightful winner of the historic poll, a statement that has reignited debates about Nigeria’s democratic journey.

The annulment of the 1993 election, widely regarded as one of the freest and fairest in Nigeria’s history, plunged the country into a political crisis, derailing its democratic process and cementing Babangida’s legacy as a polarizing figure. For decades, the decision has been a sore point, with many Nigerians accusing the former leader of robbing the nation of a chance at stable civilian rule. Babangida, who ruled from 1985 to 1993, had previously defended the annulment as a necessary step to avert chaos, but his latest remarks signal a shift in tone.

Speaking at the unveiling of his memoirs in Abuja, Babangida reflected on the events of over three decades ago. “Looking back, I see now that the will of the people was clear, and MKO Abiola should have been allowed to lead,” he said, his voice carrying a note of contrition. “It is a burden I have carried, and I hope this truth brings some measure of closure.” The memoirs, which detail his eight-year rule, are expected to offer further insights into the behind-the-scenes machinations that led to the annulment.

The revelation has sparked a firestorm of reactions across Nigeria. On social media platforms like X, opinions range from cautious praise to outright skepticism. “Too little, too late,” wrote one user, echoing a sentiment shared by many who feel the apology cannot undo the years of political instability that followed. Others, however, see it as a step toward accountability. “This is a rare moment of honesty from a leader of that era. Let’s use it to heal and learn,” a prominent activist posted.

Political analysts and historians have also weighed in. Dr. Amina Sule, a lecturer at the University of Lagos, described the admission as “significant but incomplete.” She noted, “Babangida’s regret is a personal reckoning, but it doesn’t address the systemic damage or compensate for the lives lost in the protests that followed.” The June 12 annulment triggered widespread unrest, with pro-democracy groups and citizens clashing with security forces, culminating in Abiola’s arrest and death in custody in 1998 under suspicious circumstances.

The timing of the statement, coinciding with the memoir launch, has led some to question its sincerity. “Is this remorse or a sales pitch?” asked Lagos-based journalist Tunde Adebayo. “ Nigerians deserve more than words—they deserve justice for June 12.” Calls for historical accountability are growing, with advocacy groups renewing demands for an official inquiry into the annulment and posthumous recognition of Abiola’s mandate.

Abiola’s family has yet to issue a formal response, though sources close to them suggest mixed emotions. “It’s a bittersweet moment,” said an associate. “Acknowledgment is welcome, but it reopens old wounds.”

As Nigeria grapples with its past, Babangida’s admission adds a new chapter to the June 12 saga. Whether it will lead to reconciliation or deepen longstanding grievances remains to be seen. For now, the nation watches—and remembers.