Defendants Discharged for Lack of Evidence
The Federal High Court in Abuja discharged and acquitted 50 individuals accused of belonging to the proscribed IPOB. Justice James Omotosho ruled that the prosecution failed to provide credible evidence linking the defendants to terrorism charges. The court determined that the prosecution could not establish a prima facie case against the accused.
Allegations Unsupported by Evidence
The prosecution alleged the defendants promoted terrorism by carrying items linked to IPOB while traveling in a truck. The court ruled the evidence presented failed to substantiate these claims. Justice Omotosho clarified that the recovered cowries, calabashes, and red cloth were cultural artifacts, not terrorism-related weapons.
No Proof of Conspiracy
The judge determined the prosecution failed to prove intent or agreement among the defendants to commit an unlawful act. He emphasised that no evidence demonstrated collaboration or intent to support conspiracy charges. The court clarified that mere presence in a truck does not establish criminal conspiracy. The prosecution’s case lacked substantial proof to link the defendants to any illegal agreement or activity.
Prosecution’s Case Deemed Flimsy
The judge criticised the prosecution for making unsubstantiated claims, asserting the defendants were traveling for a burial. Justice Omotosho highlighted the lack of evidence linking the defendants to terrorism activities. He described the case as fabricated charges against individuals who were coincidentally arrested together.
Defendants Acquitted
Justice Omotosho struck out all charges, declaring, “The prosecution has failed to establish any case against the defendants. Their no-case submission is upheld, and they are hereby discharged and acquitted of all charges.” This ruling highlights the need for credible evidence in cases involving allegations of terrorism.
Follow us on Socials: