Delay as Judge Forgets Ruling
Human rights lawyer and activist Dele Farotimi was granted bail on Friday by a Chief Magistrate’s Court in Ado Ekiti, Ekiti State, after spending 16 days in custody on charges of criminal defamation. The courtroom proceedings experienced an unusual delay when the presiding magistrate, Abayomi Adeosun, reportedly forgot his ruling at home. Despite the mix-up, Farotimi was eventually granted bail under stringent conditions, drawing widespread attention to the ongoing case.
Bail Conditions and Restrictions
The court set Farotimi’s bail at ₦30 million, with two sureties, one of whom must own property in Ekiti. Additional conditions included the surrender of his international passport and a strict prohibition against giving media interviews during the trial. These measures reflect the court’s intention to ensure Farotimi remains available for subsequent proceedings while limiting public commentary on the high-profile case.
Heightened Security at Court Premises
The courtroom was under heavy security as Rapid Response Squad (RRS) operatives patrolled both the premises and its surroundings. This heightened alert was reportedly due to the large turnout of human rights activists and advocacy groups who rallied in support of Farotimi. The significant police presence underscored concerns over potential unrest as demonstrators called for his unconditional release and questioned the defamation charges.
Charges Linked to Critical Commentary
Farotimi’s charges stem from alleged defamatory content in his book, Nigeria and Its Criminal Justice System. The book critiques systemic corruption and inefficiencies in Nigeria’s judicial processes. While the Federal High Court in Abuja has issued an ex-parte order halting the book’s production and distribution, Farotimi maintains his innocence, arguing that his work aims to expose societal injustices rather than defame individuals.
Farotimi’s Abduction and Arraignment
Before his bail, Farotimi was reportedly abducted by police in Lagos and transported to Ekiti under contentious circumstances. Advocacy groups have condemned the manner of his detention, labeling it a violation of his rights. His eventual arraignment and the court’s decision to adjourn the bail ruling to December 20 left him in custody longer than anticipated, heightening public outrage.
Broader Implications for Activism and Justice
Farotimi’s release has sparked widespread debate about the intersection of activism, freedom of expression, and Nigeria’s judicial system. Supporters argue that the charges are politically motivated attempts to silence dissent, while critics view the case as a test of the country’s commitment to free speech. With the trial set to continue, the case has become a focal point in discussions about judicial reform and the protection of activists.
Follow us on Socials: