Proposed Bill for a Six-Year Term Rejected by Nigerian Lawmakers
On Thursday, Nigeria’s House of Representatives rejected a bill proposing a six-year single term for key officials. The bill, introduced by Honourable Ikeagwuonu Ugochinyere, aimed to amend the 1999 Constitution. It sought to implement rotational leadership and reduce election-related costs. The proposal targeted the President, Governors, and Local Government Chairpersons.
Ugochinyere and 33 other lawmakers backed the proposal, which suggested alternating the Presidency every six years between zones.
The bill also recommended holding all executive and legislative elections on the same day to reduce costs and streamline elections.
Arguments in Favor of the Bill
During the plenary, Speaker Tajudeen Abbas introduced the bill for a second reading, where Ugochinyere passionately defended the motion. He argued that the proposed changes would enhance national unity and bring about significant savings for the country. A key feature of the bill was the proposal for the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) to collaborate with the National Assembly to set a single election date, thus simplifying the electoral system.
Supporters believed a six-year single term would reduce desperation for re-election, preventing political instability caused by term limits.
They viewed the six-year term as an opportunity for officials to execute plans without the constant re-election pressure.
Bill Faces Strong Opposition
Despite the arguments put forward by the bill’s sponsors, it met with significant resistance. After a voice vote, the majority of lawmakers rejected the bill, with only a few expressing support. Speaker Abbas upheld the decision, leading to the formal dismissal of the proposal. The rejection ensures that Nigeria’s current system, with a four-year renewable term for elected officials, remains in place.
The failure of the bill to gain traction highlights the difficulty in enacting constitutional changes in Nigeria, especially when such changes are perceived to disrupt the current political balance or introduce new complexities into the system.
Proposal to Align Executive and Legislative Elections
Another key aspect of the bill was the inclusion of a new subsection to Section 76 of the 1999 Constitution. This proposed that all elections for executive and legislative positions be conducted on the same day. Proponents argued that this simultaneous election process would foster a more inclusive governance system and ensure greater participation from citizens across all levels of government.
The proposal was seen as a measure to reduce the costs associated with organizing separate elections and encourage broader political engagement. However, the failure to pass the bill means that separate election cycles for the executive and legislative arms of government will continue as they are currently structured.
Public Reactions and Mixed Opinions
Since the bill was first introduced in June, it has sparked diverse reactions across Nigeria. Supporters hailed the proposal to reduce political competition and curb incumbency culture, while critics dismissed it as a distraction.
The Conference of United Political Parties criticized the bill, emphasizing that Nigeria’s main challenge is ineffective leadership and accountability.
For many Nigerians, the focus remains on improving governance, addressing economic challenges, and ensuring the efficient use of public resources rather than revising electoral structures.
What’s Next for Nigeria’s Electoral System?
With the rejection of the six-year single term bill, the status quo remains, with Nigerian politicians continuing to serve the traditional four-year terms. The debate over tenure lengths and electoral reforms is likely to persist in future legislative sessions. However, the failure to pass this bill underscores the complexities involved in making changes to Nigeria’s political and electoral frameworks.
For now, the Nigerian people will continue to work within the existing system, while lawmakers and citizens alike await further discussions on reforms aimed at improving the country’s political stability and governance.
For further insights, follow us on our