In a recent interview, Nigerian activist and politician Omoyele Sowore addressed the contentious incarceration of Nnamdi Kanu, leader of the Indigenous People of Biafra (IPOB). Sowore accused some Igbo elites of playing a significant role in Kanu’s continued detention, motivated by fears of the perceived impact of his activities on Nigeria’s unity.

Political Motivations and Unfair Detention
According to Sowore, the Nigerian government is holding Kanu as a “hostage” due to the belief that he threatens Nigeria’s territorial integrity. He asserts that Kanu’s arrest and extradition from Kenya were conducted unlawfully, violating international law and undermining judicial rulings. Despite court orders calling for his release, Kanu remains incarcerated, raising concerns about fairness in the justice system.

Legal Context and Unlawful Extradition
Sowore emphasized that Kanu’s forced extradition from Kenya was a clear violation of legal protocols, describing it as an “extraordinary rendition.” The activist insisted that following this unlawful extradition, judicial processes should be nullified and voided. He highlighted that Kanu was forced to escape due to a military attack on his residence.

Political Intrigue and Conspiracy
Sowore further claimed that some influential Igbo elites are partly responsible for Kanu’s detention, aligning with broader political interests to prevent his rise. This, he argues, underscores the influence of internal and external political actors who view Kanu’s actions as detrimental to their control and authority.

Conclusion
Sowore’s assertions in the interview underscore the deep divisions within Nigerian politics and reveal intricate conspiracies that allegedly impact the detention of separatist leaders. This controversy continues to highlight the complexity of the Nigerian justice system and raises questions about transparency and fairness.