Federal Court Orders Ban on Controversial Book
The Federal High Court in Abuja issued an injunction halting the sale of Dele Farotimi’s book “Nigeria and its Criminal Justice System” over defamation claims. Afe Babalola, SAN, filed a lawsuit alleging the book falsely accused him of judicial manipulation for personal benefit, prompting the court’s order. Justice Adenike Lawal signed the injunction, mandating seizure of all copies, including digital versions, from online and physical platforms. This court decision sparked widespread attention, fueling debates about judicial independence, freedom of expression, and defamation laws’ role in Nigeria.
Details of the Court Order
The court’s interlocutory injunction explicitly bars Farotimi and any affiliated parties from further publishing or distributing the book in any format. The court order reads:
“An order of interlocutory injunction restraining the defendant/respondent, whether acting by himself, his staff, employees, servants, privies, representatives, agents, publishers, distributors, sellers, re-publishers, re-sellers, or any other person… from further publishing, selling, circulating, advertising, or distributing the physical/hard/digital/soft copies of the book…”
The book, which recently topped Amazon’s bestseller list in the politics category, has been at the center of public discourse for its critical examination of Nigeria’s judicial system. Critics argue that the ban raises serious concerns about censorship and the suppression of dissenting voices.
Farotimi’s Legal Troubles Deepen
This development follows Farotimi’s recent arraignment before an Ado-Ekiti Magistrate Court on charges of criminal defamation. The activist lawyer was reportedly abducted in Lagos last week by unidentified operatives before being transferred to Ekiti State for prosecution.
Farotimi pleaded not guilty to the charges, with his legal team aggressively pursuing a bail application. However, the prosecution opposed the request, citing the risk of witness intimidation and possible flight. The court has adjourned the bail ruling to December 20, leaving Farotimi in custody for the time being.
Implications for Freedom of Expression
The case has reignited discussions on the state of free speech and the role of the judiciary in protecting individual rights. Farotimi’s supporters argue that the lawsuit is an attempt to silence a vocal critic of Nigeria’s judicial practices. “This is about much more than one book; it’s about the future of free expression in our democracy,” said Femi Adebayo, a human rights advocate.
However, legal experts caution that defamation claims must be taken seriously to protect reputations from baseless attacks. “Freedom of speech does not equal freedom from accountability,” noted Bisi Alade, a constitutional lawyer.
Next Steps in the Legal Battle
As the legal proceedings continue, both sides are preparing for what promises to be a landmark case in Nigerian jurisprudence. Farotimi’s defense team has indicated plans to challenge the injunction and defend the claims made in the book as matters of public interest.
The case has drawn international attention, with human rights organizations calling for an impartial review of the charges against Farotimi. Observers say the outcome could set a precedent for how Nigeria navigates the tension between free expression and reputational rights in the digital age.
Follow us on Socials: