The Presidency swiftly counters to Atiku’s allegations by casting doubt on his ethical integrity, referencing his past entanglements in comparable conflicts of interest.
Atiku claimed the road contract was awarded to Hitech Construction due to its connection with President Bola Tinubu. He argued Seyi Tinubu’s board role in a Chagoury-associated company added suspicion. Seyi Tinubu’s board role in CDK, a tile company in Sagamu, adds significance to the situation. The Presidency firmly defended Seyi Tinubu’s right to conduct business, emphasizing the Chagourys’ limited involvement in CDK.
Additionally, Atiku criticized the extensive demolition for the highway, fearing negative impacts on foreign investment. His concerns over the highway’s construction’s potential deterrent effect on foreign investment were expressed.
The Presidency countered Atiku’s claim of investor deterrence by showcasing significant foreign investments and economic progress under Tinubu’s leadership. This response reaffirms the Presidency’s dedication to fostering economic growth and business opportunities amid political challenges. It underscores the administration’s commitment to economic expansion and the promotion of business ventures despite political turmoil. The Presidency’s rebuttal challenges Atiku’s assertion, emphasizing the administration’s focus on economic development and stability.
By casting aspersions on Atiku’s moral standing, the Presidency aimed to discredit his accusations, highlighting inconsistencies in his past conduct.
Expressing surprise, the Presidency reacted to Atiku’s accusations against President Tinubu regarding conflicts of interest in awarding contracts. The allegations regarding the Lagos-Calabar Coastal highway contract to Hitech Construction Company particularly drew astonishment from the Presidency. The Presidency’s response reflects its astonishment at the accusations leveled against President Tinubu by Atiku.
Additionally, the Presidency raised doubts about Atiku’s credibility to make such claims, pointing to his past involvement in establishing Intels Nigeria with an Italian businessman during his tenure at the Nigeria Customs Service.
The Presidency rhetorically questioned whether this behavior amounted to an abuse of office and a violation of his oath of service.
Moreover, the Presidency accused Atiku of endorsing the sale of over 145 state-owned enterprises to his acquaintances and allies during his time as Chairman of the National Council on Privatisation.
The defense of Seyi Tinubu’s business dealings underscores the administration’s resolve to uphold individuals’ rights to pursue legitimate economic activities, despite allegations of impropriety.
Follow us on Socials: